Main Article Content
Nutritional management of chronic renal failure by dietitians - the South African experience
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this descriptive study was to assess the practices of South African dietitians regarding the dietary treatment of patients with chronic renal failure.
Subjects and design: A questionnaire was mailed to 600 randomly selected dietitians registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa. Practices were compared to international standards for pre-dialysis, haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
Results: A 26% response rate was obtained, with only 28% of these dietitians indicating that they counsel renal patients. The majority of dietitians met the international dietary recommendations, but a substantial number deviated from them. This was especially evident in PD patients, where the deviation ranged from 20% (4 dietitians) in the case of energy and phosphate, to 55% (11 dietitians) in the case of calcium. Parameters used for the assessment of nutritional status included body mass index (45% of dietitians), serum albumin (44%), clinical examinations (43%), bioelectrical impedance (37%) and diet history (36%). Methods used to monitor dietary compliance included biochemistry, dietary history, anthropometric measurements and clinical investigation. The most frequently used approaches in the management of protein-energy malnutrition included supplemental drinks (86%) and dietary enrichment at household level (76%).
Conclusion: Although the majority of dietitians met international standards for most nutrients, there was some variation and uncertainty. Ongoing education will enable South African dietitians to treat renal patients competently and with confidence.
South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition Vol. 18(2) 2005: 60-66
Subjects and design: A questionnaire was mailed to 600 randomly selected dietitians registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa. Practices were compared to international standards for pre-dialysis, haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
Results: A 26% response rate was obtained, with only 28% of these dietitians indicating that they counsel renal patients. The majority of dietitians met the international dietary recommendations, but a substantial number deviated from them. This was especially evident in PD patients, where the deviation ranged from 20% (4 dietitians) in the case of energy and phosphate, to 55% (11 dietitians) in the case of calcium. Parameters used for the assessment of nutritional status included body mass index (45% of dietitians), serum albumin (44%), clinical examinations (43%), bioelectrical impedance (37%) and diet history (36%). Methods used to monitor dietary compliance included biochemistry, dietary history, anthropometric measurements and clinical investigation. The most frequently used approaches in the management of protein-energy malnutrition included supplemental drinks (86%) and dietary enrichment at household level (76%).
Conclusion: Although the majority of dietitians met international standards for most nutrients, there was some variation and uncertainty. Ongoing education will enable South African dietitians to treat renal patients competently and with confidence.
South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition Vol. 18(2) 2005: 60-66