Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 28, 2021Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Views of emergency medical care students on the value of simulation for achievement of clinical competence
Abstract
Background. Simulation is a commonly used method for clinical learning and assessment in the health sciences. However, despite technological advancements, we are unable to perfectly simulate the appearance and behaviour of real patients, including the stressors, distractions and surroundings commonly encountered in the authentic clinical environment. In South Africa, simulations are used extensively in the education and training of emergency care practitioners (ECPs).
Objective. To investigate and describe the views of ECP students regarding the value of simulation v. four other learning methods in preparing them for real-world practice.
Methods. ECP students (N=79) completed a purposefully designed questionnaire. A Likert scale was used to obtain participants’ views on how well simulation ranks compared with theoretical lectures, tutorials, inhospital and prehospital work in preparing them for clinical practice.
Results. Participants valued simulation as an educational tool. Simulation was ranked as the best method for teaching clinical assessments and procedures and came second only to the real clinical environment for teaching clinical decision-making. Simulation was ranked third, after theoretical classes and prehospital shifts, with regard to learning to take a history and identify life-threatening conditions.
Conclusions. ECP students view simulation as a valuable learning method to manage incidents, conduct clinical assessments, perform procedures and make clinical decisions. Simulation, however, has limitations and was seen as less suited for teaching history-taking and identification of life-threatening conditions. Further research is needed to determine the ideal blend of simulation with other pedagogies in the education of ECP students.
