Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 9, 2018Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Research: Implementing the Angoff method of standard setting using postgraduate students: Practical and affordable in resource-limited settings
Abstract
Background. Cut scores for students’ assessments have always been arbitrarily determined in many institutions. Some institutions have adopted reliable methods of determining cut scores, such as the Angoff method. However, use of this method requires many experts, making it difficult to implement in resource-limited settings. The possibility of involving postgraduate students in implementing the Angoff method of setting cut scores could be the solution to this problem.
Objectives. To explore the knowledge and practices of faculty regarding standard setting and the feasibility of using postgraduate students when implementing the Angoff method.
Methods. This was an exploratory operations research study in which data were collected during focus group discussions. Students were trained to use the Angoff method, i.e. a previous examination, in which the pass mark was 50%, was used to evaluate the method.
Results. Initial findings showed that faculty in the consortia of schools did not know what standard setting and the Angoff method entailed and had never used this approach. The postgraduate students involved in implementing the Angoff method of setting cut scores were excited and interested in engaging in the exercise; the pass mark they arrived at was 61.21%.
Conclusion. The study demonstrated that it is feasible to use the Angoff method of determining pass marks, even in resource-limited settings. This can be made possible by involving postgraduate students in the absence of enough faculty experts.
