Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 9, 2016Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Student feedback on an adapted appraisal model in resource-limited settings
Abstract
Background. An appraisal model, a type of formal mentorship programme for a cohort of student doctors, is used at the University of Leeds, UK. The
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa implemented an adapted version of the appraisal process that uses fewer resources.
Objective. To explore students’ experiences of the appraisal process in order to provide information to medical schools with limited resources, which
seek to develop or refine their own mentorship processes.
Methods. A questionnaire containing Likert-type scales and open-ended questions was distributed to students. Students’ responses were analysed using
descriptive statistics and content analysis.
Results. Eighty-seven percent of the students had met with their appraiser once, and only 36% felt that they had built a rapport with their appraiser.
Students were more willing to discuss academic problems (87%) and less willing to discuss personal matters (51%) with their appraiser.
Conclusion. Despite failing to build a rapport with their appraisers, students indicated that the chance to discuss academic and personal problems, and
their appraisers’ advice on study and career matters, had been beneficial. To improve the rapport between students and appraisers a number of suggestions
that require few or no additional resources are made.
