Main Article Content
Self-regulation – the key to progress in clinical reasoning?
Abstract
Objectives. This study was conducted to gauge the value of the case-based intervention with the aim of determining the need for further scaffolding and support, especially for non-progressing students.
Methods. The 2011 BChD IV cohort (N=48) was identified for the study. Two semi-structured focus group discussions were conducted. Group 1 (n=8) consisted of students who progressed .9%, while group 2 (n=8) comprised students who did not progress to the same extent.
Results. Both groups lauded the scaffolding that the case-based curriculum provided. Strategic thinking, goal orientation and self-regulation ability were identified in group 1. A lack of diligence, poor data-processing ability and a possible lack of interest were identified in group 2 students, who were unaware of learning opportunities.
Conclusion. There is a need for early identification of students lacking self-regulated learning and for providing timely feedback and support to progressively develop their clinical reasoning skills.