Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 15, 2016Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Preclinical medical students’ performance in and reflections on integrating procedural and communication skills in a simulated patient consultation
Abstract
Objectives. To assess students’ performance of integrated procedural and clinical communication skills in a simulated consultation, and analyse and interpret their reflections on the value and challenges of these integrated assessments.
Methods. A mixed-method study was conducted to assess a convenience sample of 207 third-year medical students’ integration of procedural and consultation skills in a simulated patient consultation and explore their self-assessment and reflections on the value of the assessment.
Results. The average percentages scored for procedural and communication checklist items were compared. Facilitators and participants scored procedural skills significantly higher, indicating poor integration of communication skills. A thematic analysis of written reflections revealed that students learned by: (i) experiencing an authentic consultation; (ii) integrating their procedural and communication skills as well as their knowledge and skills; (iii) experiencing the assessment as learning; and (iv) becoming aware of the effects of emotion.
Conclusion. Although the majority of students were not able to integrate their skills in performing a simulated consultation, they nonetheless appreciated the value of the assessment as a learning experience.
