Article Sidebar
DOI:
10.4314/tjpr.v11i1.2Keywords:
Article Details
Submission of a manuscript to this journal is a representation that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All authors named in each manuscript would be required to sign a form (to be supplied by the Editor) so that they may retain their copyright in the article but to assign to us (the Publishers) and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known or created in the future) to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the contribution, (ii) translate the contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or abstracts of the contribution, (iii) create any other derivative works(s) based on the contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located, and (vi) license any thrid party to do any or all of the above.
Main Article Content
Preparation of Mucoadhesive Patches for Buccal Administration of Metoprolol Succinate: In Vitro and In Vivo Drug Release and Bioadhesion
Abstract
Purpose: To develop mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of metoprolol succinate and to evaluate their in vitro and in vivo bioadhesion.
Methods: The mucoadhesive buccal patches were prepared by solvent casting technique using two different mucoadhesive polymers. The formulations were tested for in vitro drug permeation studies, buccal absorption, in vitro drug release studies, moisture absorption as well as for in vitro and in vivo bioadhesion.
Results: The peak detachment force and work of adhesion for MC5 (sodium carboxymethylcellulose, i.e., Na CMC) patch were 0.87 N and 0.451 mJ respectively and the corresponding values for CH5 (chitosan) were 5.15N and 0.987 mJ. Formulation CH5 (prepared with chitosan) showed 67.1 % release, while MC5 (Na CMC) showed drug release of 81.9 % in 6 h. Basic pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax, Tmax and AUCtotal varied statistically (p < 0.05) when given by the buccal route compared with that of the solution given by the oral route.
Conclusion: The results indicate that formulation of suitable bioadhesive buccal patches with the desired permeability is feasible. The development of bioadhesive buccal formulation for metoprolol succinate with a lower dose and few side effects may be attainable.
Keywords: Mucoadhesive, Buccal patches, Metoprolol succinate, Sodium carboxymethylcellulose, Chitosan, Bioavailability
