Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 9, 2022DOI:
10.4314/njt.v41i5.6Keywords:
Article Details
Copyright belongs to the Faculty of Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
The contents of the articles are the sole opinion of the author(s) and not of NIJOTECH.
NIJOTECH allows open access for distribution of the published articles in any media so long as whole (not part) of articles are distributed.
A copyright and statement of originality documents will need to be filled out clearly and signed prior to publication of an accepted article. The Copyright form can be downloaded from https://www.nijotech.com/downloads/COPYRIGHT%20FORM.pdf while the Statement of Originality is in Statement of Originality.pdf (nijotech.com)
For articles that were developed from funded research, a clear acknowledgement of such support should be mentioned in the article with relevant references. Authors are expected to provide complete information on the sponsorship and intellectual property rights of the article together with all exceptions.
It is forbidden to publish the same research report in more than one journal.
Main Article Content
Goal programming and genetic algorithm in multiple objective optimization model for project portfolio selection: a review
Abstract
Many scientific fields, such as engineering, data analytics, and deep learning, focus on optimization. Optimization problems are classified into two types based on the number of optimized objective functions: single objective and multi objective optimization problems. In this paper, a comparative review since 2000 using one of the deterministic and stochastic modelling approaches called goal programming (GP) and genetic algorithm (GA) in multi-objective optimization problem is discussed. This study gives a prime review of the application of GP and GA in various criteria of project portfolio selection problem. GP is a method for solving large-scale multi-objective optimization problems to assist decision makers in finding solutions that satisfy several competing goals. GA on the other hand are global meta-heuristic search algorithms that are used to provide approximation or optimal solutions to large-scale optimization problems. Of the 23 articles considered in this review showed that, from more than 100 projects, GA proved near optimal, feasible solution and efficient frontier in projects ranking, projects interaction and a preferred decision support tool of project portfolio selection. In addition, the two models select projects on risk-based approach, but GA proved to be more effective in terms of number of projects proposed, central processing unit (CPU) time and accuracy. The review concludes that, in multi-objective optimization model for project portfolio selection problems on a large-scale, very large or complex problems and less CPU time, GA is more effective than GP in multi-objective optimization problems. The review also showed gaps in previous studies of GP and GA application on project portfolio selection problem (PPSP). This review will aid scholars and demanding practitioners in gaining a broader understanding of goal programming and genetic algorithms in the context of project portfolio selection problems.
