Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 29, 2015DOI:
10.4314/njt.v34i3.30Keywords:
Article Details
Copyright belongs to the Faculty of Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
The contents of the articles are the sole opinion of the author(s) and not of NIJOTECH.
NIJOTECH allows open access for distribution of the published articles in any media so long as whole (not part) of articles are distributed.
A copyright and statement of originality documents will need to be filled out clearly and signed prior to publication of an accepted article. The Copyright form can be downloaded from https://www.nijotech.com/downloads/COPYRIGHT%20FORM.pdf while the Statement of Originality is in Statement of Originality.pdf (nijotech.com)
For articles that were developed from funded research, a clear acknowledgement of such support should be mentioned in the article with relevant references. Authors are expected to provide complete information on the sponsorship and intellectual property rights of the article together with all exceptions.
It is forbidden to publish the same research report in more than one journal.
Main Article Content
Effective Hydraulic Conductivity for a Soil of Variable Pore Size with Depth
Abstract
Two models were derived for the estimation of effective hydraulic conductivity (Ke) of a soil layer based on exponential and inverse square variation of hydraulic conductivity with soil depth. Darcy’s law was applied to a vertical soil stratum subdivided into a finite number of layers. The relationship between Ke and layer thickness is of quadratic form with R2 ≈ 1.As the layer thickness increases, the values of Ke for the exponential model increases drastically, exceeding the Ke estimate of the power model. The percentage difference between the two models assumes an asymptotic form to the y-axis at a percentage difference of 5%, as the size of layer approaches zero. power model gives lower estimates of Ke than the exponential model within soil depth range of 1.5m ≤ D ≤ 3.2m for n = 2; 0.8m ≤ D ≤ 1.9m for n = 50; and 0.7m ≤ D ≤ 1.9m for n = 100 and above. For very shallow soil stratum (D ≤ 2), the exponential model gives better and more realistic estimates of Ke than the power model; while for medium to deep soil stratum (D ≥ 2), the power model gives better estimates of Ke.
