A Split‑Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Rate of Canine Retraction after a Soft Tissue Procedure Compared Against a Corticotomy Procedure for Accelerated Tooth Movement

Abstract

Background and Aim: Various methods to accelerate the orthodontic tooth movement have been used, among which corticotomy is  considered to be the most common one. The suggested reasoning for such acceleration was the regional acceleratory phenomenon  (RAP). Since the RAP is a property of both the hard and soft tissues, we designed a soft tissue flap procedure to compare the effects with  the conventional corticotomy procedure. A split-mouth study was conducted where the two procedures were assessed in a single  participant.

Patients and Methods: The total sample size was calculated to be 40 with 20 participants in each group. The rate of tooth movement was the primary outcome measure, and the secondary outcomes were dentoalveolar changes, which were studied in both the  conventional corticotomy and the flap‑only procedure based on a cone‑beam computed tomography (CBCT) wherein the alveolar  bone density (BD) around canines, tipping, and rotational changes in canines, premolars, and molars were assessed.

Results: Corticotomy  resulted in greater canine angulation, lesser canine rotation and premolar rotation, and greater molar rotation compared  with flap elevation, but these differences were statistically insignificant.

Conclusion: Though the corticotomy resulted in higher BD, the  differences were statistically insignificant. There was no significant difference in the rate of space closure assessed by the two techniques  compared