SOME STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF TRADITIONAL ACADEMIC ANTHRO-SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Analysis of this monograph, and the research project from which it stems offers the basis for a discussion of some strengths and weaknesses of traditional academic anthro-sociological research. Such strengths are to be found in (small scale) studies of community value systems. The weaknesses arise when such studies are conducted either in isolation from wider national frame works or -as in this case -inserted into them almost at random. The volume contains many conceptual and technical errors. These fall, especially, in three categories: 1. ethnicity taken as a unique determinant of social consciousness; 2. conceptual and technical confusion over the nature of health service development and utilization; and, 3. failure to recognize (much less analyze) the fact of the Ethiopian revolution and its likely effects on the people and issues under discussion. Most of the specific recommendations of the research project are found to be ill conceived and often in gross error. Finally, the monograph demonstrates the difficulty of understanding the processes of social change through analyses based primary on small communities divorced from -or improperly located within -their wider social context. This difficulty is especially clearly demonstrated in this study as it was carried out at a special moment of dynamic revolutionary history, which moment the monograph's authors appear not to have noticed.