Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 29, 2021Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Perceptions of changes made to a clinical skills curriculum in a medical programme in South Africa: A mixed methods study
Abstract
Background. In 2015, a medical curriculum review at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, identified too large a gap between the medical school-based teaching in the fourth year of the course and the hospital-based teaching in the fifth year, when students begin their clinical clerkships. A number of changes were made to the curriculum to improve the preparation of students for the expectations of the clinical setting.
Objectives. To determine students’ perceptions of how well their clinical skills curriculum in the fourth year prepared them for their clinical clerkships in the fifth year.
Methods. An exploratory mixed methods approach was used. Phase I was a narrative qualitative study. The data underwent qualitative analysis and the categories that emerged informed the development of a questionnaire for phase II. This was a cross-sectional, comparative, quantitative study comparing students taught in the new curriculum (2018; fifth-year students (n=299)) with those taught in the old curriculum (2018; sixth-year students (n=291)).
Results. The fifth- and sixth-year students had response rates of 50% and 34%, respectively. The results showed a perception of improved preparation for clinical clerkship through the changed clinical skills training. The p-value for 14 of the 16 questions was ˂0.05, with a 95% confidence interval, indicating that the difference between the two cohorts was statistically significant.
Conclusion. The new curriculum has resulted in a significant improvement in students’ perceived preparation for their clinical clerkships.
