Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 12, 2019Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Advocacy: Are we teaching it?
Abstract
Background. Health advocacy has been identified as a key outcome competency in the undergraduate curriculum for a number of health professions by the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) and the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban, SA. Despite health advocacy and activism playing a strong role in the student body and civil society, there has been only limited engagement with the manner in which to teach health advocacy in the health professions literature.
Objectives. To assess how the faculty in health professions programmes at UKZN understood health advocacy and how it was covered in the curriculum.
Methods. Focus group discussions were held with faculty from undergraduate health professions programmes at the university regarding how health advocacy was understood and how it was being integrated into the current curriculum. A thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts of the focus groups.
Results. A range of ways in which health advocacy was understood became apparent in the focus groups, with a few disciplines indicating that they do not cover health advocacy explicitly in the curriculum. Three main focus areas of health advocacy training were identified: for the profession (particularly in the smaller health professions groups); for services within the health system; and for patients or communities. The main points of departure for health advocacy were ethics and human rights and to a much lesser degree social justice. There was generally limited experience of how health advocacy could be taught as a skill and little consensus between the participating disciplines regarding the scope and content of health advocacy training. Advocacy itself was also seen as potentially risky, which could undermine the relationship between the university and the service platform. Similarly, the potential risk to whistle-blowers and the institutional culture in universities and public sector services were also seen as limitations.
Conclusions. Ample opportunities were identified for the potential teaching of health advocacy in complex professional and public sector interactions. Dual loyalty was seen to be a key dilemma for how to approach advocacy as part of work-based learning, and linked to considerable risk to the institution, educators and students. The current review offers an exciting opportunity to define more clearly what the outcome competencies of health advocacy are, particularly in the context of transformative health professions education – and how these can be operationalised in the overall curriculum.
