Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 12, 2019Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Initiating curriculum mapping on the web-based, interactive learning opportunities, objectives and outcome platform (LOOOP)
Abstract
Background. A web-based curriculum is made transparent by providing multidimensional overviews of content (learning objectives) aligned with learning outcomes and frameworks, opportunities and assessment formats. A South African university embarked on the mapping of its curricula on the web-based learning opportunities, objectives and outcome platform (LOOOP).
Objectives. To reflect on the customisation of LOOOP and training of lecturers, and to determine lecturers’ perceptions of the usability and value of LOOOP.
Methods. The project manager reflected on the initiating processes, and a survey determined the lecturers’ perceptions of the usability and value of curriculum mapping, using a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire. The convenience sample comprised the first 30 lecturers who had uploaded their curriculum content and consented to partake in this ethics-approved study. Descriptive statistics portray the percentages of agreement on the positive statements of the questionnaire.
Results. Challenges related to slow staff buy-in and development were experienced. Required modifications to LOOOP were promptly dealt with. The majority of participants agreed on the usability (≥89%), as well as structure and transparency (≥87%) of LOOOP. Mapping is expected to enhance curriculum revision (≥95%) and communication (≥96%), viewing the curriculum scope, complexity and cohesion (97%), as well as abstracting data for management analysis and reporting (100%).
Conclusions. The lecturers agreed on the usability and values of curriculum mapping, which indicates that online mapping is sufficiently beneficial to justify the time and resources invested. Mapping should be a product of collaborative participation and planned as a long-term commitment, which can also be used to research the impact of mapping on student learning.
