Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 22, 2018Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the AJHPE is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The AJHPE does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors. The corresponding author should also indicate if the research forms part of a postgraduate short report, dissertation or thesis.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.Main Article Content
Checklist of cognitive contributions to diagnostic errors: A tool for clinician-educators
Abstract
Background. Experienced clinician-educators readily identify trainees making diagnostic errors, but lack pedagogic expertise to make educational diagnoses and provide feedback. Simple tools are needed to address this challenge.
Objectives. To characterise cognitive contributions to diagnostic errors (CCDEs) that trainees make in patient encounters and examiners’ perceptions of a checklist to document and provide feedback on these errors.
Methods. Thirty examiners used a 17-item checklist to document CCDEs made by medical residents failing patient encounters in a national specialist examination. A survey was used to explore examiners’ perceptions of the checklist to document and provide feedback on these errors.
Results. There were 98/264 failed patient encounters (37%). Ninety-four completed checklists documented 691 CCDEs (median of 7 per encounter). Data synthesis was more problematic than data gathering, faulty knowledge or data interpretation (p<0.001 for all comparisons). The ‘top 5’ individual CCDEs were failure to elicit history and/or examination findings; poor knowledge of clinical features (illness scripts); case synthesis (‘putting the case together’); and misinterpretation of clinical findings. Examination-related errors were more common than history-related errors (p<0.0001). Examiners found the checklist comprehensive and easy to use. They thought it could improve feedback on CCDEs to unsuccessful candidates and guide remediation and training at the bedside.
Conclusions. A 17-item checklist identified three priority CCDEs requiring remediation and training in medical residency programmes: improving clinical skills; developing adequate illness scripts; and putting a case together. Examiners endorsed the use of the checklist and its potential to improve feedback and training, addressing CCDEs made by trainees.
