Article Sidebar
DOI:
10.4314/tjpr.v10i4.4Keywords:
Article Details
Submission of a manuscript to this journal is a representation that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All authors named in each manuscript would be required to sign a form (to be supplied by the Editor) so that they may retain their copyright in the article but to assign to us (the Publishers) and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known or created in the future) to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the contribution, (ii) translate the contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or abstracts of the contribution, (iii) create any other derivative works(s) based on the contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located, and (vi) license any thrid party to do any or all of the above.
Main Article Content
Grewia Gum 2: Mucoadhesive Properties of Compacts and Gels
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the mucoadhesive performance of grewia polysaccharide gum with those of guar gum, carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and carbopol 971P. Methods: Grewia polysaccharide gum compacts or gels as well as those of guar gum, carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or carbopol 971P were prepared. Texturometric and tensile analysis of the polymer gels and compacts were carried out using a software-controlled penetrometre, TA.XTPlus texture analyzer. The polymer gels were evaluated for hardness, stickiness, work of cohesion and work of adhesion. Furthermore, the detachment force of the polymer compacts from a mucin substrate was evaluated. Results: The work of adhesion of guar gels was significantly greater than that of grewia gels (p < 0.001) but the latter showed a significantly greater work of adhesion than carboxymethylcellulose gels (p < 0.05) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose gels (p < 0.001). However, the work of cohesion for grewia/mucin gel mixture was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than those of carboxymethylcellulose/mucin, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/mucin and carbopol 971P/mucin gel blends. The difference between the mucoadhesive performance of grewia compacts and those of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and carbopol 971P compacts was insignificant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Grewia polysaccharide gum demonstrated good mucoadhesive properties, comparable to those of carbopol 971P, carboxymethylcellulose, guar gum and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and therefore, should be suitable for the formulation of retentive drug delivery devices.
Keywords: Grewia polysaccharide gum, Texture analyzer, Mucoadhesive performance, Work of cohesion/adhesion.
