Article Sidebar
Published:
Sep 6, 2024DOI:
10.4314/tjpr.v23i8.6Keywords:
Article Details
Submission of a manuscript to this journal is a representation that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All authors named in each manuscript would be required to sign a form (to be supplied by the Editor) so that they may retain their copyright in the article but to assign to us (the Publishers) and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known or created in the future) to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the contribution, (ii) translate the contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or abstracts of the contribution, (iii) create any other derivative works(s) based on the contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located, and (vi) license any thrid party to do any or all of the above.
Main Article Content
Determination of optimal dosage of extract of Angelica gigas Nakai against benign prostatic hyperplasia
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of Angelica gigas Nakai ethanol extract (AGNEX) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) models induced by castration and testosterone propionate (TP) injection.
Methods: 30 rats were randomly divided into six groups of five rats each. One group was used as a normal control (CON) and the other groups were castrated and injected intraperitoneally with TP to induce BPH. Positive control group (PCON) was administered finasteride (5 mg/kg) for 4 weeks and BPH-induced group without treatment was used as negative control (NCON). Groups administered AGNEX (1.25 mg/kg (AG1.25), 5 mg/kg (AG5), or 10 mg/kg (AG10)) instead of finasteride were assigned as study groups. The complete blood cell and lipid profiles, liver and kidney function assays, serum 5α-reductase activity and DHT levels as well as the histological examination of prostate tissues were determined.
Results: The prostate volume of AG10 group decreased by approximately 35 % compared to BPH induced group (NCON). The prostate weight ratio decreased by 10 % in BPH + finasteride group compared to NCON group, and by 24 and 22 % in the AG5 and AG10 groups, respectively. AG10 group exhibited the lowest levels of 5α-reductase and dihydrotestosterone. Histopathological observations of prostate tissue showed normal cell shapes and reduced intraluminal polyp formation in the control and AGNEX-administered groups.
Conclusion: The administration of 10 mg/kg of AGNEX is optimal dose for protective effect against BPH. Therefore, AGNEX has potentials for further investigations as source of lead agents for BPH management.
