Article Sidebar
Published:
Mar 7, 2018Keywords:
Article Details
Submission of a manuscript to this journal is a representation that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All authors named in each manuscript would be required to sign a form (to be supplied by the Editor) so that they may retain their copyright in the article but to assign to us (the Publishers) and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known or created in the future) to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the contribution, (ii) translate the contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or abstracts of the contribution, (iii) create any other derivative works(s) based on the contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located, and (vi) license any thrid party to do any or all of the above.
Main Article Content
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of azithromycin and benzathine penicillin in early syphilis
Abstract
Purpose: To systematically analyze the efficacy of azithromycin and benzathine penicillin in early syphilis, and provide guidance for diagnosis and treatment.
Methods: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and control studies according to keywords, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Related documents and meeting records were also searched manually to extract study types, basic information of study objects, intervention measurements and study results, and evaluation of the quality of the methodology used.
Results: Three studies were excluded from the review. The quality evaluation was B grade, and heterogenicity was good. We adopted a fixed effect model to conduct the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the cure rate between azithromycin and benzathine penicillin administered for 6 months. The ORs for 3 time points were 0.96 (95% CI = 0.71, 1.29), 0.01 (95% CI = -0.05, 0.06), and 0.04 (95% CI = -0.02, 0.11; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events among the three studies.
Conclusion: There was no apparent difference in the efficacy of azithromycin and benzathine penicillin in early syphilis. The advantages of azithromycin included good compliance, a long half-life, and a high economic benefit.
Keywords: Early syphilis, Azithromycin, Benzathine penicillin, Curative effect
