Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 14, 2017Keywords:
Article Details
Submission of a manuscript to this journal is a representation that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All authors named in each manuscript would be required to sign a form (to be supplied by the Editor) so that they may retain their copyright in the article but to assign to us (the Publishers) and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known or created in the future) to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the contribution, (ii) translate the contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or abstracts of the contribution, (iii) create any other derivative works(s) based on the contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located, and (vi) license any thrid party to do any or all of the above.
Main Article Content
Comparative assessment of poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles modified by either cetyltrimethylammonium bromide or chitosan for plasmid DNA adsorption
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) PLGA nanoparticles modified by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) or chitosan for plasmid DNA adsorption.
Methods: PLGA nanoparticles were prepared by solvent diffusion method and modified by including CTAB in the aqueous (F1) or oil phase (F2), or by including low (F3) or medium (F4) molecular weight chitosan. The nanoparticles were characterised by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), as well as for cell toxicity, cell uptake and transfection.
Results: CTAB failed to confer positive charge on the nanoparticles. CTAB desorbed easily from F1 surface. This resulted in negative zeta potential, increased cytotoxicity as well as decreased cell uptake and transfection. In F2, CTAB was located mainly in PLGA matrix, resulting in negative charge with decreased cytotoxicity, and increased cell uptake and transfection compared to F1. On the other hand, chitosan-modified nanoparticles (F3 and F4) showed stronger interaction between chitosan and PLGA, leading to positively-charged particles, decreased cytotoxicity, as well as increased cell uptake and transfection. Amongst the four formulations, F4 exhibited the highest transfection.
Conclusion: These results should aid in understanding how PLGA nanoparticles are modified by CTAB and chitosan. Modification with chitosan yields PLGA nanoparticles with higher DNA adsorption and transfection with lower cytotoxicity.
Keywords: Chitosan, cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), Nanoparticle, Poly (D,L-lactide-coglycolide) PLGA, Plasmid DNA adsorption, Gene therapy
