Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 8, 2015Keywords:
Article Details
Submission of a manuscript to this journal is a representation that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All authors named in each manuscript would be required to sign a form (to be supplied by the Editor) so that they may retain their copyright in the article but to assign to us (the Publishers) and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known or created in the future) to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the contribution, (ii) translate the contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or abstracts of the contribution, (iii) create any other derivative works(s) based on the contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located, and (vi) license any thrid party to do any or all of the above.
Main Article Content
Interactions between Plant Extracts and Cell Viability Indicators during Cytotoxicity Testing: Implications for Ethnopharmacological Studies
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the cytotoxicity of six medicinal plants (Acmella ciliata, Amaranthus tricolor, Coriandrum sativum, Glebionis coronaria, Kyllinga brevifolia and Tradescantia zebrina) using 3-(4, 5- dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and neutral red uptake (NRU) assays.
Methods: Hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol and water extracts were obtained for each plant by sequential solvent extraction. Cytotoxicity was evaluated in triplicate, from 640 to 5 μg/mL, two-fold, serially on monkey kidney epithelial (Vero) cells.
Results: The hexane, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts of the six plants were more toxic to the Vero cells compared to the ethanol, methanol and water extracts. Thirty one percent (11/36) and 75 % (27/36) of the extracts showed significant cytotoxicity (p < 0.05) in MTT and NRU assays, respectively. The 78, 52 and 7 % cytotoxicity levels detected in 27 extracts using the MTT assay were significantly (p < 0.05) underestimated at 640, 320 and 160 μg/mL, respectively, using NRU assay. Nine extracts from five plants exhibited significantly lower (p < 0.05) 50 % cytotoxic concentration (CC50) when NRU assay was employed compared to MTT assay. At 640 μg/mL, 10 of the 21 extracts were also found to react chemically with MTT, causing a 2.0 – 29.1-fold increase in the absorbance value (550 nm) compared to control.
Conclusion: The plant extracts of A. ciliata, A. tricolor, C. sativum, G. coronaria, K. brevifolia and T. zebrina show concentration- and extraction method-dependent cytotoxicity using MTT and NRU assays. NRU assay appears to be more sensitive and reliable than MTT assay for cell viability evaluation of the plant extracts.
Keywords: Acmella ciliata, Amaranthus tricolor, Coriandrum sativum, Glebionis coronaria, Kyllinga brevifolia and Tradescantia zebrina, Extraction, Medicinal plant, Neutral red uptake assay, Vero cell
