Article Sidebar
Published:
Feb 1, 2013Keywords:
Article Details
The entire contents of the Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology are protected under Indian and international copyrights. The Journal, however, grants to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, perform and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works in any digital medium for any reasonable non-commercial purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship and ownership of the rights. The journal also grants the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal non-commercial use.
This journal content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Main Article Content
Decision-delivery interval for emergency Caesarean section and perinatal outcome in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital Calabar, Nigeria
Abstract
The internationally recommended 30 minutes decision-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section has become a cause for concern in many maternity units especially in developing countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of this recommendation in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital and the consequences of any derailment. This was an analytical study that was conducted on women who had emergency caesarean section in our center over a seven-month period. None of the 150 parturients in the study population was delivered within 30 minutes of decision for emergency caesarean section. Only seven (4.7%) of the parturients were delivered within 1 hour. The mean decision-delivery interval was 3.4 hours. The perinatal mortality rate among the study population was 73 per 1000 births. Among major reasons responsible for delay in the decision-delivery interval were engagement of the theatre and non-availability of anaesthetists. Parturients with failure to progress in labour had a mean decision-delivery interval of 3.2 hours with 3.5% having moderate to severe birth asphyxia. Parturients with fetal distress had a mean decision-delivery interval of 2.8 hours with 21.9% having moderate to severe birth asphyxia. The mean decision-delivery interval of 3.4 hours was attained in parturients with obstructed labour with 50% having moderate to severe birth asphyxia. The attainment of the recommended 30 minutes decision–delivery interval for emergency caesarean section was not feasible in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital.
Key words: emergency, caesarean section, decision-delivery interval, perinatal outcome
