Intersubjectivity in the moral sphere theory of Robert Hilary Kane

Abstract

Intersubjectivity refers to the mutual constitution of social relationship. It is a sharing of subjective state by two or more individuals. Hence, shared cognition and consensus are essential in the shaping of our ideas and relations. It is a value that will enhance human dignity and interpersonal relationship. Intersubjectivity then is a starting point for any mode of ontological inquiry. In Robert Kane‟s view, it is through a positive intersubjective relationship that man sustains the moral sphere, and avoid breaking it. He suggests the idea of openness, a form of respect for another even in the face of the sharing of opinions. Hence, in any deliberation of any sort, one has to take the position of retreatants who stay put in any debate for any positive ethical conclusions. The ethical conclusions which the retreatants reached will be arrived at by anyone who in the interests of limiting narrowness of vision, chooses initially to respect every other point of view and way of life in the sense of openness, and doggedly strive to maintain this ideal in the face of obstacles and conflicts. With the philosophical tools of exposition, analysis and synthesis, the research will argue that Kane‟s use of the idea of Openness appears to be a solution to sustain commonality of living; however, he creates back the problem which he set out to resolve by not giving a stand on „the truth‟; hence, the intersubjectivity of subjectivism.