Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 30, 2013Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the SAMJ is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The SAMJ does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.
Main Article Content
Evaluation and correlation of mammographically suspicious lesions with histopathology at Addington Hospital, Durban
Abstract
predictive value (PPV) of SCNB has been shown to be reproducible in several studies using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
(BIRADS) classification, which is the current gold standard in mammographic reporting. At this stage, no study has been done in KwaZulu-
Natal to assess local outcomes against BIRADS. The current standard of care utilises vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, but is not available
in a resource-constrained environment such as ours. The need, therefore, is for constant evaluation of existing practice to ensure that it is
optimised for the challenges and limitations facing local radiologists.
Objective. To assess the PPV of SCNB in Addington Hospital, and to compare it with that of BIRADS.
Material and methods. Mammographically detected lesions were assigned to 3 categories: benign, indeterminate and suspicious. A
retrospective review of 67 SCNBs was performed for lesions falling within the suspicious category, and the PPV and rates of ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were determined.
Results. Our study demonstrated a PPV of 20.9%. This correlated well with international studies for BIRADS 4 and 5 lesions. DCIS
accounted for 21.4% of detected malignancies, which is in keeping with current literature.
Conclusion. Despite resource limitations, local outcomes were comparable with those of BIRADS. Given our fairly general categorisation
of lesions, however, it should be emphasised that BIRADS allows better organisation, consistency and clarity in breast imaging reporting,
as well as accurate data comparison between centres facing limitations similar to our own.
