Main Article Content
FAST scanning in the developing world emergency department
Abstract
Objectives. To assess the utility of an existing ultrasound machine for the purposes of focused assessment sonography in trauma (FAST) scanning in a developing world emergency department (ED).
Design. Prospective study undertaken over a 12-month period.
Trauma patients attending the ED were FAST scanned by one of three trained emergency medicine doctors.
Setting. The ED at a government hospital in rural KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), the referral centre for 22 peripheral hospitals.
Subjects. All patients presenting to the ED who had sustained
abdominal or thoracic trauma.
Outcome measures. Scans were recorded as positive or negative
for free intra-abdominal or pericardial fluid. All results were confirmed by computed tomography, laparotomy or a second trained ED ultrasonographer, followed by a period of clinical observation.
Results. 72 FAST scans were included, 52 for blunt trauma and
20 for penetrating trauma. Of the 72 scans, 15 (20.8%) were
positive. FAST scanning had 100% specificity and overall sensitivity of 71.4%. When considering blunt trauma alone the sensitivity improved to 81.3%, while in penetrating trauma it was much poorer (62.5%).
Conclusions. We propose a valuable role for FAST scanning
in all peripheral hospitals for the assessment of patients sustaining blunt trauma. In rural areas with limited resources FAST scans may assist in the appropriate timely transfer of trauma patients for further imaging or definitive surgical intervention.
Design. Prospective study undertaken over a 12-month period.
Trauma patients attending the ED were FAST scanned by one of three trained emergency medicine doctors.
Setting. The ED at a government hospital in rural KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), the referral centre for 22 peripheral hospitals.
Subjects. All patients presenting to the ED who had sustained
abdominal or thoracic trauma.
Outcome measures. Scans were recorded as positive or negative
for free intra-abdominal or pericardial fluid. All results were confirmed by computed tomography, laparotomy or a second trained ED ultrasonographer, followed by a period of clinical observation.
Results. 72 FAST scans were included, 52 for blunt trauma and
20 for penetrating trauma. Of the 72 scans, 15 (20.8%) were
positive. FAST scanning had 100% specificity and overall sensitivity of 71.4%. When considering blunt trauma alone the sensitivity improved to 81.3%, while in penetrating trauma it was much poorer (62.5%).
Conclusions. We propose a valuable role for FAST scanning
in all peripheral hospitals for the assessment of patients sustaining blunt trauma. In rural areas with limited resources FAST scans may assist in the appropriate timely transfer of trauma patients for further imaging or definitive surgical intervention.