Article Sidebar
Published:
Sep 5, 2022Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the SAMJ is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The SAMJ does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.
Main Article Content
Appropriateness of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans in a rural regional hospital in South Africa: A 6-year follow-up study
Abstract
Background. Requests for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans by doctors with different levels of experience have cost and risk implications globally. Evidence-based appropriateness criteria guide doctors to the suitable use of radiology imaging. There are few studies regarding appropriateness of CT requests in the South African (SA) context. Previous research in the Garden Route district of Western Cape Province, SA, evaluated the appropriateness of scans.
Objectives. To review the appropriateness of CT and MRI scans done in a 6-year follow-up study at one facility.
Methods. This was a retrospective descriptive study. All CT and MRI scans performed during October 2018 at George Hospital were classified according to American College of Radiology guidelines as: usually appropriate (UA), might be appropriate (MBA), or not appropriate (NA). Stratified analysis allowed simple statistics and some comparison with the previous study.
Results. A total of 515 CT and MRI scans were included, of which 81.4% were UA, 7.4% MBA and 11.2% NA. Most scans were requested by medical officers (n=255), followed by consultants (n=126) and junior doctors (n=70). Medical officers made the majority of inappropriate requests. Second-year interns requested the lowest number of inappropriate scans, with registrars not requesting any inappropriate scans. Most of the inappropriate scans were requested after hours. Thirty-seven of the 123 (30.1%) after-hours scans were inappropriately requested compared with 21 of 392 (5.4%) scans during normal working hours, which were inappropriate.
Conclusions. Although the majority of scans were being ordered appropriately, pre-authorisation by experienced physicians and incorporation of guidelines would make requests more complete and possibly more appropriate, especially after hours.
