Article Sidebar
Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the SAMJ is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The SAMJ does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.
Main Article Content
Treatment of hypertension following endotracheal intubation A study comparing the efficacy of labetalol, practolol and placebo
Abstract
Labetalol, a new adrenergic receptor antagonist, has both a- and B-blocking properties. Intravenous labetalol (0,25 and 0,5 mg/kg), practolol (0,4 mg/kg) and saline (1 ml), injected prior to anaesthesia, were compared with respect to their effect on the haemodynamic consequences of direct laryngoscopy followed by the passage of an endotracheal tube. When compared with intravenous saline injection, both labetalol and practolol obtunded the tachycardia induced by endotracheal intubation. The higher dose of labetalol was more effective in reducing the hypertensive response than the lower dose of practolol. However, none of the regimens completely abolished the adverse haemodynamic consequences of laryngotracheal, manipulations.
