Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 6, 2017Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the SAMJ is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The SAMJ does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.
Main Article Content
The prevalence of domiciliary deliveries in Khayelitsha, Cape Town
Abstract
Objective. To determine whether the 17% decrease in the number of patients cared for at the Khayelitsha Midwife Obstetric Unit (MOU) between 1991 and 1994 could be ascribed to an increase in home deliveries.
Method. Survey of Khayelitsha labour ward records, vaccination cards and family planning statistics at various clinics in Khayelitsha, Cape Town.
Results. The prevalence of home deliveries in Khayelitsha during the study period was estimated at 8%. Between 1992 and 1994, the number of acceptors at family planning clinics in Khayelrtsha increased by 89%.
Conclusion. As the number of home deliveries had apparently remained static, it was unlikely that an increase in the former had been responsible for the observed decrease in Khayelitsha MOU patients. Other possible reasons for the decline, viz. (i) an increase in hospital deliveries; (ii) an increase in the number of patients returning to the so-called homelands to be delivered there (iii) an increase in confinements by private doctors and midwives; and (iv) that patients had shunned the MOU, were equally unlikely. The decline in the number of patients cared for at Khayelitsha MOU between 1991 and 1994 was most likely due to the evident success of the local family planning programme.
