Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 14, 2016Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the SAMJ is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The SAMJ does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.
Main Article Content
Acceptability to general practitioners of national health insurance and capitation as a reimbursement mechanism
Abstract
Design. Cross-sectional survey by means of telephone interviews; four focus group discussions.
Setting. Cape Peninsula.
Participants. 174 GPs randomly sampled from a total population of 874.
Main outcome measures. Acceptance of NHI, acceptance of capitation.
Main results. 63,3% approved of NHI. More than 81 % approved of NHI if GPs would be able to maintain their independent status, e.g. own premises and working hours;
82,3% said NHI would be a more equitable system of health care, 88% approved of the fact that NHI would make care by GPs more accessible, and 73% said they would have the capacity to treat more patients. However, 61,3% of GPs disapproved of capitation as a form of reimbursement.
Conclusions. Most GPs in the Cape Peninsula were amenable to some form of NHI. However, the proportion of GPs who approved the introduction of NHI varied depending on details of the NHI system such as payment mechanisms, workload, income and effects on professional autonomy. A national survey of medical practitioners is recommended. The implications of GPs' preferences concerning the reimbursement mechanism for the feasibility of implementing a NHI system in South
Africa require serious consideration by policy-makers.
