Main Article Content

How to interpret core concepts in POPIA? Recommendations on the draft Code of Conduct for Research


Abstract

Significance:
The draft Code of Conduct for Research is a welcome development, but there is room for improvement in the way that it interprets core concepts in POPIA. In particular, it should: remove the provision regarding consent to future research; clarify that special personal information is a subclass of personal information that must comply with an extra layer of requirements; not exclude an individual researcher employed by a research institution from qualifying as a responsible party; and clearly differentiate de-identification in POPIA from corresponding terms used in other jurisdictions.


Journal Identifiers


eISSN: 1996-7489
print ISSN: 0038-2353