Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 12, 2017Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Material submitted for publication in the South African Medical Journal (SAMJ) is accepted provided it has not been published elsewhere. Copyright forms will be sent with acknowledgement of receipt and the SAMJ reserves copyright of the material published. The SAMJ does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Main Article Content
The circumareolar approach to gynecomastia and transgender surgery: modifications to provide correct nipple areolar complex position and shape
Abstract
Background: In surgery for gynaecomastia, excision with minimal scarring and correct position of the nipple areolar complex (NAC) are key to a successful outcome. We report on a pilot study on the use of a circumareolar excision and the
use of mathematical vector calculation to position the NAC and execute surgery and report on the outcomes.
Methods: From 2014 to 2015, the authors operated on 9 gynecomastia or transgender patients. Based on research performed by Gertrude Beer, Beckenstein and Shulman we designed a mathematical modification of the technique described by
Persichetti to provide correct NAC positioning as well as aesthetically pleasing NAC shape. We utilised the technique in 6 patients, 4 males with gynecomastia and 2 transgender patients. Liposuction was performed as an adjunct as needed.
Results: In 5 of the patients, the NAC did move in the direction of the desired vector. The NAC was on average within 0.4 cm of the desired nipple to mid-sternal position. The lateral movement averaged 0.6 cm. We found the modified circumareolar approach to deliver good aesthetic results with predictable NAC movement. Seroma formation was the most common complication.
Conclusion: The mathematically modified circumareolar approach to transgender and gynecomastia surgery may provide better aesthetic outcomes. Several factors need to be considered in deciding how the oval shaped vector should be designed intraoperatively. The study was limited by small sample size and short follow-up
use of mathematical vector calculation to position the NAC and execute surgery and report on the outcomes.
Methods: From 2014 to 2015, the authors operated on 9 gynecomastia or transgender patients. Based on research performed by Gertrude Beer, Beckenstein and Shulman we designed a mathematical modification of the technique described by
Persichetti to provide correct NAC positioning as well as aesthetically pleasing NAC shape. We utilised the technique in 6 patients, 4 males with gynecomastia and 2 transgender patients. Liposuction was performed as an adjunct as needed.
Results: In 5 of the patients, the NAC did move in the direction of the desired vector. The NAC was on average within 0.4 cm of the desired nipple to mid-sternal position. The lateral movement averaged 0.6 cm. We found the modified circumareolar approach to deliver good aesthetic results with predictable NAC movement. Seroma formation was the most common complication.
Conclusion: The mathematically modified circumareolar approach to transgender and gynecomastia surgery may provide better aesthetic outcomes. Several factors need to be considered in deciding how the oval shaped vector should be designed intraoperatively. The study was limited by small sample size and short follow-up
