Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 16, 2013Article Details
http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/pages/view/policies#part_4
Copyright
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
Read more here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Main Article Content
Attitudes of undergraduates towards mental illness: A comparison between nursing and business management students in India
Abstract
illness are widespread among the general public. However, little is known about the attitudes of undergraduates to mental illness.
Purpose. To compare the attitudes towards mental illness among undergraduates enrolled in nursing courses v. those enrolled in Bachelor
of Business Management (BBM) courses.
Methods. A cross-sectional descriptive design was adopted for the present study. A total of 268 undergraduates were selected to complete
the Attitude Scale for Mental Illness (ASMI) and the Opinions about Mental Illness in the Chinese Community (OMICC) questionnaires.
Results. We found significant differences between the number of nursing and BBM students who agreed with statements posed by the
questionnaires, e.g., that they would move out of their community if a mental health facility was established there (÷2=16.503, p<0.002), that they were not afraid of treated mentally ill people (÷2=15.279, p<0.004), and that people with mental illness tend to be violent (÷2=14.215, p<0.007) and dangerous (÷2=17.808, p<0.001). Nursing students disagreed that people with mental illness are easily identified (÷2=30.094, p<0.000), have a lower IQ (÷2=70.689, p<0.000) and should not have children (÷2=24.531, p<0.000). Nursing students were more benevolent than BBM students, as they agreed that people with mental illness can hold a job (÷2=49.992, p<0.000) and can return to their former position (÷2=11.596, p<0.021), that everyone faces the possibility of becoming mentally ill (÷2=38.726, p<0.000), and that one should not laugh at the mentally ill (÷2=17.407, p<0.002). Nursing students held less pessimistic attitudes, as they felt that the mentally ill should receive the same pay for the same job (÷2=10.669, p<0.031) and that the public are prejudiced towards people with mental illness (÷2=17.604, p<0.001).
Conclusion. College students’ attitudes towards people with mental illness vary based on the course that they are enrolled in. Attitudes may be positively improved by revising curriculum design to incorporate educational sessions about mental illness. These are essential steps to
combat discrimination, and potentially enhance the promotion of human rights for the mentally ill.
