Main Article Content
Inaugural lecture: Philosophy enough
Abstract
This inaugural lecture was delivered at the Howard College Campus of
UKZN on 2 April 2008. In it I do three things. First I sketch some arguments
in favour of a naturalist conception of philosophy. The conclusions that I’m
after are that philosophy is not an autonomous enterprise, so that it had better be continuous with scientific enquiry if it is to get anywhere. A supplementary claim I defend briefly is that the natural and social sciences should be viewed as more integrated than they usually are. Second, I offer some reasons for rejecting all identifiable forms of social constructivism about knowledge. Finally, I say something about what ‘African Scholarship’ might mean, given the preceding considerations. There I briefly defend the claim that there is no epistemically interesting sense in which there is such a thing as African knowledge.
UKZN on 2 April 2008. In it I do three things. First I sketch some arguments
in favour of a naturalist conception of philosophy. The conclusions that I’m
after are that philosophy is not an autonomous enterprise, so that it had better be continuous with scientific enquiry if it is to get anywhere. A supplementary claim I defend briefly is that the natural and social sciences should be viewed as more integrated than they usually are. Second, I offer some reasons for rejecting all identifiable forms of social constructivism about knowledge. Finally, I say something about what ‘African Scholarship’ might mean, given the preceding considerations. There I briefly defend the claim that there is no epistemically interesting sense in which there is such a thing as African knowledge.
