Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 30, 2014Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Material submitted for publication in the South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyl (SAJOG) is accepted provided it has not been published elsewhere. Copyright forms will be sent with acknowledgement of receipt and the SAJOG reserves copyright of the material published.
The SAJOG does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Main Article Content
Asymptomatic bacteriuria in women attending an antenatal clinic at a tertiary care centre
Abstract
Objective. To compare the diagnostic performance of urine microscopy, leucocyte esterase and nitrite dipstick tests and various combinations of these as screening tests for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy.
Methods. Pregnant women (N=800) attending an antenatal clinic were recruited at their first visit. Urine microscopy, culture and dipstick testing were performed on a random clean-catch midstream urine sample. A count of >105 colony-forming units of a single organism per millilitre of urine was taken as significant. Dipstick results were read as positive according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Results. A total of 800 eligible women were screened. The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria as diagnosed by urine culture was 5.0% (n=40). Escherichia coli was the most prevalent uropathogen isolated by culture (60.0%). Neither urine microscopy nor the leucocyte test was found to be sufficiently sensitive to be used as a single screening test for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant patients. The nitrite test alone had a sensitivity of 82.5% and a specificity of 99.9%. Combined dipstick testing had an improved sensitivity of 87.3% and a specificity of 96.2%. Addition of urine microscopy to combined dipstick testing increased the sensitivity to 95.0%, and the specificity became 92.4%.
Conclusion. Combined dipstick testing is a useful screening test for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Addition of urine microscopy to combined dipstick testing further improves its diagnostic performance.
Methods. Pregnant women (N=800) attending an antenatal clinic were recruited at their first visit. Urine microscopy, culture and dipstick testing were performed on a random clean-catch midstream urine sample. A count of >105 colony-forming units of a single organism per millilitre of urine was taken as significant. Dipstick results were read as positive according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Results. A total of 800 eligible women were screened. The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria as diagnosed by urine culture was 5.0% (n=40). Escherichia coli was the most prevalent uropathogen isolated by culture (60.0%). Neither urine microscopy nor the leucocyte test was found to be sufficiently sensitive to be used as a single screening test for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant patients. The nitrite test alone had a sensitivity of 82.5% and a specificity of 99.9%. Combined dipstick testing had an improved sensitivity of 87.3% and a specificity of 96.2%. Addition of urine microscopy to combined dipstick testing increased the sensitivity to 95.0%, and the specificity became 92.4%.
Conclusion. Combined dipstick testing is a useful screening test for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Addition of urine microscopy to combined dipstick testing further improves its diagnostic performance.
