Article Sidebar
Published:
Feb 3, 2009Article Details
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose. AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
Read more here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Main Article Content
Supporting rape survivors to adhere to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent HIV infection: The importance of psychosocial counselling and support
Abstract
Eleven years after it was first mooted in 1996, the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act (32 of 2007) came into effect in December 2007. Law-makers proudly lauded sections 28 and 29 of the Act, which set out how post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent HIV infection should be made available to rape survivors.* These clauses are, however, neither particularly novel nor innovative, Cabinet having already approved (in April 2002) the provision of antiretroviral drugs to prevent HIV infection following rape. Subsequent to Cabinet's decision, a few studies were conducted examining various facets of providing PEP as part of a health response to rape.1-4 In theory, these findings should have provided legislators with some insight into what was required by rape survivors from a PEP service, particularly in relation to psycho-social support. This was not the case, as we will show in this article, which draws on unpublished findings from 67 interviews with rape survivors† exploring their adherence to PEP.
Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine Vol. 9 (3) 2008: pp.24-21
