Article Sidebar
Published:
Sep 7, 2022DOI:
10.4314/sajg.v9i2.21Keywords:
Article Details
Authors who submit papers to this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright over their work, while allowing the journal to place this work on the journal website under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely access, use, and share the work, with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and its initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to waive the terms of the CC license and enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution and subsequent publication of this work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c) In addition, authors are encouraged to post and share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point after publication on the journal website.
Main Article Content
Assessing the accuracy of online GNSS processing services and commercial software on short baselines
Abstract
With the rapid establishment of free online processing services to provide users with reliable solutions, it is important to determine the reliability of using free online processing software for the Global Navigation Satellite System post-processing. The study aim at assessing the accuracy of two (2) free online processing software, AUSPOS, and CSRS-PPP and two (2) commercial software, compass post-processing, and GNSS solutions. Field observations were carried out on seven (7) control points using static GNSS observation techniques with an observation period of 1hr for three (3) consecutive days and conventional surveying using total station instruments to establish a closed traverse. The acquired data were post-processed using both online and commercial software. The co-ordinates generated from each software were then compared with the ones obtained using total station instruments to determine their relative discrepancies and accuracies. Root mean square error and T-test were used for the analysis of the result. The result obtained is (0.004m, 0.003m and 0.007m) for compass post-processing software and (0.015m, 0.012m and 0.016m) for GNSS solutions software and the online software had the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of (0.025m, 0.023m and 0.027m) for AUSPOS and (0.034m, 0.037m and 0.041m) for CSRS-PPP both in X, Y, and Z direction i.e. UTM East, North and ellipsoidal height respectively. Analysis at a 5% level of significance shows no significant difference between the two methods. Online GNSS processing services are easy to use, do not require the knowledge of GNSS data processing and can be adopted for engineering and geodetic applications.
