Department of Translation and Interpreting Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
Josephat Mutangadura
Department of Linguistics, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Lameck Gonzo
Department of Linguistics, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
George Mavunga
Academic Development Centre, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus, PO Box 17011, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa
Main Article Content
Language and the legal process: A linguistic analysis of courtroom discourse involving selected cases of alleged rape in Mutare, Zimbabwe
Paul Svongoro
Josephat Mutangadura
Lameck Gonzo
George Mavunga
Abstract
This article analyses the nature of courtroom discourse in a Zimbabwean context in cases of alleged rape. The research investigated the language used by both court officials and lay persons during legal proceedings and examined the linguistic and socio-cultural factors that motivate the choice of certain lexical and syntactic features. Transcripts of court proceedings held at the Mutare Magistrates’ courts between November 2006 and March 2007 were the primary source of data. A multi-faceted analytic approach including Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), conversational analysis and text linguistics was employed. It was established that the courtroom discourse of both court officials and lay persons in cases of alleged rape was characterised by differences in linguistic features such as euphemisms, sexually explicit register, technical (legal) jargon and syntactic complexity.The research also established that, while some linguistic features used by courtroom participants serve a purely legal function, others serve important socio-cultural functions. The findings of the study, it was concluded, have practical implications for both law and linguistics. An example is the need for the training of court officials to raise their sensitivity to language use in cases of alleged rape in order to improve the presentation of evidence in such cases.
South African Journal of African Languages 2012, 32(2): 117–128
Donate
AJOL is a Non Profit Organisation that cannot function without donations.
AJOL and the millions of African and international researchers who rely on our free services are deeply grateful for your contribution.
AJOL is annually audited and was also independently assessed in 2019 by E&Y.
Your donation is guaranteed to directly contribute to Africans sharing their research output with a global readership.
Once off donations here:
For annual AJOL Supporter contributions, please view our Supporters page.
Tell us what you think and showcase the impact of your research!
Please take 5 minutes to contribute to our survey so that we can better understand the contribution that African research makes to global and African development challenges. Share your feedback to help us make sure that AJOL's services support and amplify the voices of researchers like you.