Article Sidebar
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
By submitting manuscripts to SAFP, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the SA Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care. Copyright of review articles are assigned to the Publisher, Medpharm Publications (Pty) Ltd, unless otherwise specified. Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAFP for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.
Main Article Content
Second-stage primary Caesarean deliveries: Are maternal complications increased?
Abstract
Background: Second-stage Caesarean sections (CSs) are known to be associated with increased complications but most reports originate from
tertiary hospitals, which attend to high-risk patients. Complication rates may differ in district hospitals, which attend to low-risk patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective study carried out at a district maternity unit in Durban. The hospital records of all CSs over an eight-month period
were reviewed and obstetric and neonatal complications of second-stage CSs were compared with a group of first-stage CSs performed during the
study period.
Results: There were 4 654 deliveries, including 1 257 CSs, in the study period. The CS rate was 27.2%. Of 617 (8.5%) emergency CSs, 53 were
performed in the second stage of labour.
The maternal and neonatal complication rates were low and no statistical differences were found between the patients who had second-stage or
those who had first-stage CSs, except for increased blood loss, blood-stained urine, prolonged operative times and postoperative fever for secondstage
CSs.
Conclusions: Second-stage CSs performed in a district hospital are associated with increased maternal complication rates but not with neonatal
complications.
tertiary hospitals, which attend to high-risk patients. Complication rates may differ in district hospitals, which attend to low-risk patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective study carried out at a district maternity unit in Durban. The hospital records of all CSs over an eight-month period
were reviewed and obstetric and neonatal complications of second-stage CSs were compared with a group of first-stage CSs performed during the
study period.
Results: There were 4 654 deliveries, including 1 257 CSs, in the study period. The CS rate was 27.2%. Of 617 (8.5%) emergency CSs, 53 were
performed in the second stage of labour.
The maternal and neonatal complication rates were low and no statistical differences were found between the patients who had second-stage or
those who had first-stage CSs, except for increased blood loss, blood-stained urine, prolonged operative times and postoperative fever for secondstage
CSs.
Conclusions: Second-stage CSs performed in a district hospital are associated with increased maternal complication rates but not with neonatal
complications.
