Article Sidebar
Keywords:
Caesarean section rates private health sector
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
By submitting manuscripts to SAFP, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the SA Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care. Copyright of review articles are assigned to the Publisher, Medpharm Publications (Pty) Ltd, unless otherwise specified. Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAFP for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.
Main Article Content
Rising rates of Caesarean sections: an audit of Caesarean sections in a specialist private practice
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide; rates in the private sector in South Africa are reported to be particularly high.
To the best of our knowledge there has been no recent audit of Caesarean sections performed by the private health sector in KwaZulu-Natal. The aim
of this study was to carry out an audit of CS in a private practice.
Methods: An audit of the patient records over a period of one year was done. No personal identifiers were noted or reported on. All relevant clinical
data were pooled and used to analyse the clinical information.
Results: There were 364 deliveries in the study period and 209 of these were CS, giving a rate of 60.4%. Most of the caesarean sections were carried
out because of a previous CS; maternal request and HIV status also contributed to the high rate.
Conclusion: The high CS rate in private practice is probably a window to the increased rates of Caesarean section being performed worldwide.
This high rate is in keeping with trends in countries such as South America, and is considerably higher than the ideal rate of 10 to 15% in low-risk
obstetric populations suggested by the WHO.
To the best of our knowledge there has been no recent audit of Caesarean sections performed by the private health sector in KwaZulu-Natal. The aim
of this study was to carry out an audit of CS in a private practice.
Methods: An audit of the patient records over a period of one year was done. No personal identifiers were noted or reported on. All relevant clinical
data were pooled and used to analyse the clinical information.
Results: There were 364 deliveries in the study period and 209 of these were CS, giving a rate of 60.4%. Most of the caesarean sections were carried
out because of a previous CS; maternal request and HIV status also contributed to the high rate.
Conclusion: The high CS rate in private practice is probably a window to the increased rates of Caesarean section being performed worldwide.
This high rate is in keeping with trends in countries such as South America, and is considerably higher than the ideal rate of 10 to 15% in low-risk
obstetric populations suggested by the WHO.
