Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 17, 2014Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
By submitting manuscripts to SAFP, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the SA Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care. Copyright of review articles are assigned to the Publisher, Medpharm Publications (Pty) Ltd, unless otherwise specified. Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAFP for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.
Main Article Content
A focus group study on primary health care in Johannesburg Health District: “We are just pushing numbers”
Abstract
Objectives: South Africa is striving towards a strong primary healthcare system. Since 2007, departments of family medicine have been established in Gauteng to improve quality of care through improved access to doctors, the coordination of health services and better referrals. There have been anecdotal difficulties around clinical quality, the role of the increasing number of doctors and the value of family medicine as a new speciality in Johannesburg since these changes. This study aimed to explore Johannesburg stakeholder views on clinical priorities, the role of doctors and family medicine in primary care.
Design: The study design comprised qualitative focus group discussions.
Setting and subjects: Groups of nurse clinicians, clinic managers, senior managers, doctors and interns within the Johannesburg Health District.
Outcome measures: The content was thematically analysed and a model developed.
Results: There were nine focus groups, with 6-13 participants per group. Addressing staff burnout and poor management were viewed as clinical priorities in primary care. Discussing the role of doctors reflected deep conflict between doctors and nurses. Nurses and managers expected doctors to help to “push the queues”. It took some time for further roles, such as helping with referrals, training, research and administration, to emerge. There was initial confusion and tension when participants were asked about family medicine. However, its role was seen as useful.
Conclusion: Nurses appeared to suffer from burnout and resented the increasing burden placed on them with regard to primary care in Johannesburg. There appeared to be confusion with respect to the role of doctors, with doctor-nurse conflict and poor teamwork. This may threaten attempts to re-engineer primary health care in order to increase the presence of doctors at clinic level. The discipline of family medicine can make a difference, but reorganisation of the system is required.
Design: The study design comprised qualitative focus group discussions.
Setting and subjects: Groups of nurse clinicians, clinic managers, senior managers, doctors and interns within the Johannesburg Health District.
Outcome measures: The content was thematically analysed and a model developed.
Results: There were nine focus groups, with 6-13 participants per group. Addressing staff burnout and poor management were viewed as clinical priorities in primary care. Discussing the role of doctors reflected deep conflict between doctors and nurses. Nurses and managers expected doctors to help to “push the queues”. It took some time for further roles, such as helping with referrals, training, research and administration, to emerge. There was initial confusion and tension when participants were asked about family medicine. However, its role was seen as useful.
Conclusion: Nurses appeared to suffer from burnout and resented the increasing burden placed on them with regard to primary care in Johannesburg. There appeared to be confusion with respect to the role of doctors, with doctor-nurse conflict and poor teamwork. This may threaten attempts to re-engineer primary health care in order to increase the presence of doctors at clinic level. The discipline of family medicine can make a difference, but reorganisation of the system is required.
