Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures, Biodiversity Stewardship and Statutory Intervention – A South African Perspective

Abstract

Area-based approaches are a central component of global efforts to conserve biodiversity. While the focus of many countries has been  mainly on protected areas, other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMS) have been accorded global recognition in the past  decade as a vital complementary approach to protected areas. This recognition has been reemphasised in the Kunming-Montreal  Global Biodiversity Framework adopted by parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in December 2022, with its Target 3 ratchetting up area-based coverage targets to 30 per cent by 2030. A growing focus and reliance on OECMs to contribute towards  achieving this target is anticipated. The international community has in the past few years introduced some guidance to identify, secure,  manage, monitor and verify the anticipated long-term biodiversity conservation outcomes of OECMs. Some commentators have argued  for domestic legal intervention to complement this general international guidance. The South African Government has recognised the  potential contribution of OECMs towards the achievement of domestic and global areabased biodiversity targets in its National Protected  Areas Expansion Strategy (2018) but has alluded to the need for legal intervention to ensure that they achieve positive and sustained long-term outcomes for the in situ conservation of biodiversity. Some domestic commentators have highlighted the strong link between  biodiversity stewardship (particularly conservation areas) and OECMs, advocating that these conservation areas should form the priority  focus of domestic efforts to identify OECMs. This article scopes this potential link and specifically considers whether the current domestic  legal and policy framework applicable to these conservation areas is sufficiently robust to ensure that only appropriate areas are  identified as OECMs and that once recognised, they are governed and effectively managed in the long term. It highlights several frailties of the existing framework and drawing from anticipated legal reform in the Western Cape relating to biodiversity stewardship, it  proposes a possible model for future national legislation regulating OECMs.