Brief summary of the agreement
Anyone is free:
· to copy, distribute, and display the work;
· to make derivative works;
· to make commercial use of the work;
Under the following conditions: Attribution
· the original author must be given credit;
· for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are;
· any of these conditions can be waived if the authors gives permission.
Statutory fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above
Author Biographies
Frédérique Vallières
Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland
Emma Louise Cassidy
Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland
Eilish McAuliffe
Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland
Sidina Ould Isselmou
World Vision Mauritania, ZRB 510 Tevragh Zeina M/S, Nouakchott, BP 335 Mauritanie
Mohamed Saleh Hamahoullah
World Vision Mauritania, ZRB 510 Tevragh Zeina M/S, Nouakchott, BP 335 Mauritanie
Juliet Lang
World Vision Ireland, The Mews, Rathmines Park, Dublin 6, Ireland
Main Article Content
Where are the gaps in improving maternal and child health in Mauritania? the case for contextualised interventions: a cross sectional study
Frédérique Vallières
Emma Louise Cassidy
Eilish McAuliffe
Sidina Ould Isselmou
Mohamed Saleh Hamahoullah
Juliet Lang
Abstract
Introduction: It is estimated that any progress made towards improving maternal and child health in Mauritania has likely stalled. A lack of reliable and up-to-date data regarding maternal and child health indicators makes it difficult to identify current gaps and adapt international programmes to meet local needs Methods: Using secondary data collected as part of a baseline assessment for a maternal and child health programme being implemented in two health departments, we compared maternal and child health indicators across two different samples of pregnant women and children under-five in M’bagne and Guérou. Descriptive analyses were conducted using a Pearson’s Chi-Squared test, assuming a binomial distribution and a confidence level of alpha=0.05. Results: Our results indicated that there were marked regional differences in maternal and child health indicators between these two rural sites, with M’bagne generally performing better across a range of indicators including: immunisation rates, child registration, vitamin A supplementation, deworming, delivery in the presence of a skilled birth attendant, and post-natal care coverage. In Guérou we observed lower rates of fever, diarrhoea, and fast and difficult breathing among children under-five. Conclusion: Though socio-cultural differences may play a part in explaining some of these observed differences, these alone do not account for the observed differences in maternal and child health indicators. Context-specific activities to overcome barriers to care must be designed to address such rural regional differences if we are to see an improvement across maternal and child health indicators and accelerate progress towards MDGs 4 & 5 in Mauritania.
Pan African Medical Journal 2013; 14: 97
Donate
AJOL is a Non Profit Organisation that cannot function without donations.
AJOL and the millions of African and international researchers who rely on our free services are deeply grateful for your contribution.
AJOL is annually audited and was also independently assessed in 2019 by E&Y.
Your donation is guaranteed to directly contribute to Africans sharing their research output with a global readership.
Once off donations here:
For annual AJOL Supporter contributions, please view our Supporters page.
Tell us what you think and showcase the impact of your research!
Please take 5 minutes to contribute to our survey so that we can better understand the contribution that African research makes to global and African development challenges. Share your feedback to help us make sure that AJOL's services support and amplify the voices of researchers like you.