Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the journal.
Author Biographies
JA Harrison
JAH Environmental Consultancy, 10 Wembley Ave, Plumstead, Cape Town 7800, South Africa
AJ Williams
Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
M MacIver
Intaka Environmental Committee, Century City Property Owners’ Association, PO Box 0004, Century City 7446, South Africa
Main Article Content
Breeding site selection by colonial waterbirds given various combinations of constructed or natural alternatives over a 10-year period
JA Harrison
AJ Williams
M MacIver
Abstract
Understanding breeding site preferences is important for management of colonial waterbirds. The number of active colonial waterbird nests at a series of four small constructed wetlands in Cape Town was counted monthly from 1999 to 2008. In total 491 pairs belonging to 11 waterbird species were involved. Between 1997 and 2004 a number of different artificial structures were used to attract colonial waterbirds to breed at one of the constructed wetlands. The changes in use of the different artificial structures, and of natural reedbeds, for nesting revealed the site preferences of different waterbird species. Structures that simulated flooded dead trees were most successful in attracting breeding waterbirds. Reedbeds were used for nesting when the number of such artificial structures was reduced. When the reedbeds were removed some birds returned to the artificial structures, whereas others moved to a more distant wetland. Some species were pioneers that provided public information about safety from predation that apparently encouraged birds in other species to settle. Safety from potential mammalian predators was clearly the prime consideration in breeding locality selection. Adverse winds and human disturbance were less important factors.
OSTRICH 2010, 81(3): 197–203
Donate
AJOL is a Non Profit Organisation that cannot function without donations.
AJOL and the millions of African and international researchers who rely on our free services are deeply grateful for your contribution.
AJOL is annually audited and was also independently assessed in 2019 by E&Y.
Your donation is guaranteed to directly contribute to Africans sharing their research output with a global readership.
Once off donations here:
For annual AJOL Supporter contributions, please view our Supporters page.
Tell us what you think and showcase the impact of your research!
Please take 5 minutes to contribute to our survey so that we can better understand the contribution that African research makes to global and African development challenges. Share your feedback to help us make sure that AJOL's services support and amplify the voices of researchers like you.