Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the journal.
Author Biographies
M Mulotwa
Laboratoire LEGERA, Département d’Ecologie et Gestion des Ressources Animales et Végétales, Faculté des Sciences (Biologie), Université de Kisangani, BP 2012, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo
M Louette
Zoology Department, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium
A Dudu
Laboratoire LEGERA, Département d’Ecologie et Gestion des Ressources Animales et Végétales, Faculté des Sciences (Biologie), Université de Kisangani, BP 2012, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo
A Upoki
Laboratoire LEGERA, Département d’Ecologie et Gestion des Ressources Animales et Végétales, Faculté des Sciences (Biologie), Université de Kisangani, BP 2012, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo
RA Fuller
The Ecology Centre, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
Main Article Content
Congo Peafowl use both primary and regenerating forest in Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo
M Mulotwa
M Louette
A Dudu
A Upoki
RA Fuller
Abstract
The Congo Peafowl Afropavo congensis is a little-known species endemic to the Democratic Republic of Congo. A central question in assessing its conservation status is the degree to which it uses secondary forest. Here, we measure relative use of two contiguous forest blocks in Salonga National Park, one patch of primary forest and another of secondary forest that has been regenerating for over 30 years. We searched for Congo Peafowl using systematic surveys along a transect grid, and exhaustive searching of smaller subsections of habitat for secondary signs of peafowl presence (feathers and droppings). Detections of secondary signs of peafowl presence were significantly more frequent in secondary than in primary forest, and 19 of the 31 sightings of birds were in secondary forest. Microhabitats used by the birds differed between forest types, with those in secondary forest being closer to the nearest watercourse, having fewer large trees, and lower plant species richness. In addition, fewer taxonomic groups were found in peafowl droppings collected in secondary forest. Overall, our results demonstrate that old regenerating forest is heavily used by Congo Peafowl at least in this area. Secondary habitats must therefore be considered when planning for the conservation of this species, particularly where regenerating forest fragments might connect larger blocks of habitat.
OSTRICH 2010, 81(1): 1–6
Donate
AJOL is a Non Profit Organisation that cannot function without donations.
AJOL and the millions of African and international researchers who rely on our free services are deeply grateful for your contribution.
AJOL is annually audited and was also independently assessed in 2019 by E&Y.
Your donation is guaranteed to directly contribute to Africans sharing their research output with a global readership.
Once off donations here:
For annual AJOL Supporter contributions, please view our Supporters page.
Tell us what you think and showcase the impact of your research!
Please take 5 minutes to contribute to our survey so that we can better understand the contribution that African research makes to global and African development challenges. Share your feedback to help us make sure that AJOL's services support and amplify the voices of researchers like you.