Things Fall Apart back to the Owners: Adapting Achebe’s Text to Film for the Igbo Populace

Abstract

At the beginning of scholarship on film adaptation, critics dismissed adapted films as watered down versions of their literary antecedents.  Scholars such as Woof (1950) argued that the films were reductive of the supremacy of the texts, and that films depended  on the popularity of literary texts in order to gain credibility. This fidelitybetrayal aesthetic would see adapted films reviled and  disregarded as fodder only fit for the lower classes of the society. In further arguments that were logocentric (aiming to vouch for the  supremacy of the text and dismiss the dependence of the adapted film), films adapted from literature were judged to be less  intellectually stimulating, and born out of a lack of ingenuity on the part of the filmmakers to create new works of art, completely  autonomous in their right (Cartmell, et al. (2008). Using the case of Things Fall Apart (the literary text and the adapted film) this paper,  however, seeks to counter this notion and rationalize that in adapting the film from Achebe’s text, the filmmaker succeeds in bringing the  story of Okonkwo and Umuofia back home – to the people among whom it originally happened. The main argument in this paper is  hinged on the understanding that while the text is discriminative, allowing only the schooled members of the Igbo population to read their story, the film is more accommodating. This is made possible because the cinematic medium has the ability to reach a larger section  of the Igbo people who do not have a reading chance or interpretive ability to interact with the narrative in the literary form and  the meanings thereof.