Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 21, 2023Keywords:
Article Details
The Journal is owned, published, and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. Open access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, with the work three months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivatives” 4.0) - (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Main Article Content
Surgical patients and cancer: Exploring complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) products usage in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Abstract
Background: The methods employed to treat cancer differs based on the knowledge available in the era. This study explored complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) products usage among surgical cancer patients in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was done among surgical cancer patients and marketers of CAM products in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Data obtained was analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0, and tabulated.
Results: There were 171 (41.9%) male and 237 (58.1%) female respondents. Fifty-five (13.5%) had primary education, 133 (32.6%) had secondary, and 220 (53.9%) had tertiary education. Two hundred and seven (50.7%) respondents had heard about cancer before their cancer diagnosis. While 242 (59.3%) respondents had preference for Orthodox/Conventional/English/Hospital treatment, 47 (11.5%) were inclined to CAM products, and 117 (28.7%) choose both types of treatment options. One hundred and seventy-six (43.1%) respondents had used some form of CAM products, and 64 (15.7%) opined that such treatment was effective. Breast cancer (36 = 8.8%), prostate cancer (46 = 11.3%), colon cancer (10 = 2.5%), liver cancer (10 = 2.5%), bone cancer (17 = 4.2%), were the common cancers for which CAM products had been used by the patients. Respondents with tertiary education were the least to use the CAM products.
Conclusion: Although over half of respondents preferred orthodox cancer care, close to half of them had used CAM products for varied types of cancer care. Only 15.7% of the patients found it effective.
