Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 4, 2016Keywords:
Article Details
The Journal is owned, published, and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. Open access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, with the work three months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivatives” 4.0) - (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Main Article Content
An Assessment of the Functionality of a Community Health Committee in an Oil Bearing Community in South-South Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Primary health care has been identified as the most cost-effective way of realizing health for all, and the health-related millennium development goals; while community participation in the running of health services is recognized as the key to unlocking the potentials of primary health care. This study assessed the effectiveness of a community health committee (CHC) in an oil bearing community in Rivers State, south-south Nigeria.
Method: The study was carried out using a preintervention/ post-intervention study design. The CHC was constituted, and its performance assessed after six months, using five qualitative indicators: needs assessment, leadership, resource mobilization, management and organization that were previously established by Rifkin and coworkers. The data for the study were collected through document analysis, personal observations, and interviews.
Results: Members of the CHC had an average age of 47.54 +1- 7.5 years, with at least secondary school education, and were mainly either self-employed or civil servants. The CHC was therefore found to be well constituted. The capacity of the committee for resource mobilization was graded as good, because it was able to make contacts for additional resources for the health center. The committee was however rated poor in the areas of needs assessment, leadership, and management. Most members of the committee did not understand their expected role in the committee. The committee was only able to implement 2 out of the 7 interventions identified during the community needs assessment; and was able to hold just 2 out of the 6 scheduled meetings, with only 6 (42.86%), out of the 14 members of the committee attending all the meetings. The poor performance was attributed to the committee's lack of control over the health center and its staff.
Conclusion: The constitution of a CHC does not guarantee the expected level of community participation. Effective leadership and full community control of health centers and their staff are therefore recommended.
Keywords: Community participation; Primary health care; Community health committee
