Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 31, 2021Keywords:
Article Details
NAJ supports free online communication and exchange of knowledge as the most effective way of ensuring that the fruits of research and development practice are made widely available. It is therefore committed to open access, which, for authors, enables the widest possible dissemination of their findings and, for readers, increases their ability to discover pertinent information. The Journal adopts and uses the CC: BY license and is open access. This license lets others distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Copyright for articles published in this Journal is retained by the Journal.
Main Article Content
Comparative Analysis of Efficiencies of Smallholder Rubber Farmers in Peninsular Malaysia: Conventional and Data Envelopment Analysis Models
Abstract
The main aim of this paper was to compare the technical and scale efficiencies of smallholder rubber farmers in Malaysia using Conventional and Bootstrapped –Data Envelopment Analysis Models. Multistage sampling technique was used to select 206 rubber farmers for the study, while data were collected from them using well-structured questionnaire. Under the CDEA model, 128 farmers were technically efficient in variable returns to scale, while 11 were both technically and scale efficient in constant returns to scale. Findings revealed that, using CDEA, 128 farms were found to be technically efficient under variable returns to scale (VRS), 11 farms were both technically and scale efficient under constant returns to scale (CRS). Under BDEA model, 77 farmers were technically efficient in variable returns to scale (VRS). Factors that affected the efficiency of the farmers include; race, marital status, tapping system and farms’ distance. It is therefore recommended to apply BDEA model in measuring technical efficiencies as this helps to give robust results. Also, more emphasis should be given in tapping system such as half spiral and alternate days tapping systems, and the smallholders distance away from his/her farms.
