Article Sidebar
Published:
Sep 28, 2024DOI:
10.4314/mlr.v18i2.8Keywords:
Article Details
a) Copyright of the content of the articles shall be retained by the author subject to the condition that it cannot be republished in another journal. The reproduction of the article as book chapter requires the acknowledgement of its prior publication in Mizan Law Review.
b) An author is entitled to deposit her/his published article in any Open Access repository subject to the condition that the format and layout shall not be changed. Depositing a post-publication version in any repository requires acknowledgement of the earlier version by indicating the Volume, Issue and page numbers of the version published in Mizan Law Review.
c) Articles published in Mizan Law Review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)
Privacy Statement
a) Where the Editorial Team deems it necessary, the editors may remove precise reference to names of individuals in case comments.
b) The names and email addresses submitted to and published in Mizan Law Review shall not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed in articles, comments, case comments and sharing thoughts do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editorial Team, or the publisher of the journal, i.e., Center for Law in Sustainable Development, St. Mary’s University.
Main Article Content
Secular ¬Interpretation of the Best Interest of the Child: CCI’s Decision on Child Custody in the Context of Divorced Parents (Case Comment)
Mesfin Beyene
Abstract
International and regional human rights instruments state that the child's right to freedom of religion must be entrusted to the adult parents or guardians and the instruments do not allow state intervention. Likewise, the Ethiopian Constitution allows parents to make sure that their children have religious education; and it gives jurisdiction to religious courts over matters of custody. However, such laws can be insensitive to human rights issues when religious courts and human rights clash. This comment evaluates the recent interpretation by the Council of Constitutional Inquiry (CCI) in light of international and regional practices. The comment examines whether CCI’s decision constitutes an advanced, child rights-based approach in interpreting what is in the best interest of the child in the context of divorced parents whereby the parent who has custody embraces a different religion after divorce. The analysis shows that this line of interpretation can be considered as an advanced way of child rights-based approach for interpreting best interest of the child.
