Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 3, 2007Keywords:
Modern energy services women poor rural communities Ghana Burkina Faso
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Copyright of the journal's content belongs to Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
The copyright of a submitted article is only transferred to the publishers if and when the article is accepted for publication. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publishers.
The copyright of a submitted article is only transferred to the publishers if and when the article is accepted for publication. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publishers.
Main Article Content
Energy services fro the rural poor: A comparative analysis of solar services centres and multifunctional platforms and lessons for Ghana
Abstract
Solar service centres and multifunctional platforms are innovative concepts for providing energy services in poor rural communities. For some communities, because of the size and dispersion of their location, grid-electricity is non-existent and therefore a solar service centre or a multifunctional platform is the only viable option for lighting, refrigeration, water pumping, powering of equipment etc. Though they contribute to socio-economic development of rural communities, it is however argued that the two energy services provide different frontiers of contribution to energy security. This paper therefore compares these energy services and shows how they have contributed to reduce energy-poverty in rural Ghana and Burkina Faso. The scope of the analysis covers deep-seated empirical lessons on investment costs, benefits and welfare gains, and potential in direct productive and spin-off energy demand sectors. The purpose is to draw lessons to inform rural people, energy policy makers, and development experts on both good practices and failures of the two forms of energy services. Evidence from the surveys confirms that, solar service centres and multifunctional platforms are fundamentally suitable for use in poor rural communities. However, the concern is what to go in for when faced with the problem of choice, which is critical in meeting the needs of the rural poor.
