Main Article Content
A Critique of Sections 28, As Amended, and 29 of the Companies’ Act, 1963 (Act 179)
Abstract
undercapitalisation. The Study found the content of the sections under review and the institutional arrangement for their revision weak in a number of respects. This renders the sections ineffective. The study therefore calls for their review. Also, given that in practice creditors require security and guarantees from their debtors as a condition for the grant of credit, it is doubtful whether sections 28 and 29 are needed to protect creditors. It is therefore suggested that, as an alternative to reviewing the sections, they
should be expunged from the statute.